I am on a mission. Mission to help teams {in every organization that I have worked with in the past or present} boost the visibility of key metrics throughout companies that I have worked for. I believe in a unique process improvement framework that adapts Six Sigma, COPC and Lean frameworks but faster than all of them. I call it ‘Four step pyramidal framework – OAVM’ {loosely pronounced as OM} ]
In my quest to deploy ‘OVAM’, I know that technology plays a very important role.
It is with this motto of improving information sharing, across ‘Consumer loan & Two-wheeler finance vertical’ that my current organization created a ‘Transactional Review Program’ for its Collections / Collections / Re-payment vertical.
Wanted to offer excellent support through our Collection desk & transition it to ‘Collections / Re-payment assistance vertical’. A Collections vertical that can help ‘Two-wheeler & Consumer loan vertical’ users re-pay their loans in time bound manner.
I wanted to be ahead of curve & knew that sharing more information internally and providing ten times as much proactive advice between support agents than we did before is going to be key in building a robust collection vertical.
While traditional]Quality monitoring process follow, systematic quality evaluations of support interactions; that is reviews can be carried out by manager, QA specialist I doubled it up by introducing: colleague reviews.
& Here is why, I picked Colleague Reviews
Now, here is how I implemented colleague reviews.
Here’s what the we have been able to do in short span of 90 days:
have had a very smooth and successful colleague review setup procedure. With continuous calibrations and iterations, I am sure that the system will become strong
While I know that colleague review process is a huge success; however, like each new process, there are some teething problems along the way, too.